Quote of the Day
If you enjoy programming, philosophy, math, or any number of geeky topics, you're in the right place. Every day, I'll post a random quote from my extensive collection of Kindle highlights. Quotes do not necessarily reflect my views or opinions. In fact, part of my epistemic process is to consume a wide variety of contradictory material.
05/11/2022
The identification of argument with war is so complete that if you try to suggest some alternative way of thinking about what argument is—It’s an attempt to achieve mutual understanding; It’s a means of clarifying our views—you’re almost certainly going to be denounced as a wishy-washy, namby-pamby sissy-britches.
— Alan Jacobs, How to Think
05/10/2022
Legacy modernization projects go better when the individuals contributing to them feel comfortable being autonomous and when they can adapt to challenges and surprises as they present themselves because they understand what the priorities are. The more decisions need to go up to a senior group—be that VPs, enterprise architects, or a CEO—the more delays and bottlenecks appear.
— Marianne Bellotti, Kill It With Fire
05/09/2022
…you would do well to be less vocally skeptical while still letting your team know you’re aware of the intricacies and obstacles involved in your work.
— Titus Winters, Tom Manshreck, and Hyrum Wright, Software Engineering at Google
05/08/2022
If you are not contributing code or being woken up in the middle of the night to answer a page, have the good sense to remember that no matter how important your job is, you are not the implementor. You do not operate the system, but you can find the operators and make sure they have the air cover they need to be successful. Empower the operators.
— Marianne Bellotti, Kill It With Fire
05/07/2022
In politics, I claim that progressives, conservatives, and libertarians are like tribes speaking different languages. The language that resonates with one tribe does not connect with the others. As a result, political discussions do not lead to agreement. Instead, most political commentary serves to increase polarization.
— Arnold Kling, The Three Languages of Politics
1970 post articles, 394 pages.